This forum topic discusses the recent ruling by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals regarding warrantless 2257 inspections, which have now been deemed unconstitutional. This ruling significantly affects porn producers, camsites, studios, and individuals who manage their own content, changing how they comply with 2257 regulations — specifically, the requirement to have identification for every performer.

  • The court's decision mandates that inspections for 2257 compliance now require a warrant, eliminating the previous requirement for camsites, studios, and designated custodians of records to be open to surprise inspections for 20 hours a week.
  • Discussion includes speculation on what this ruling means for individuals who are their own custodians of records. Questions are raised about potential new rights and whether it is now safer to manage one's own records without hiring a long-term custodian.
  • A link to a detailed article on the subject is provided for further reading, along with a request for the actual ruling to better understand its implications.

This topic serves as a platform for professionals in the industry to share information and insights about how this legal change impacts their operations and compliance strategies.

To read the forum, create an account. It's free!

- Between 3 and 15 characters
- Only alphanumeric characters are allowed
- Your email will not be visible to other members
- Use a valid email to activate your account