Welcome to the discussion on how SM clients are pushing boundaries. Here's a summary of insights and experiences shared:

  • Many performers have noticed an uptick in clients requesting actions or activities in premium chat that are clearly stated as exclusive content. This includes specific kinks, cam2cam interactions, and name moaning. Despite clear communication, these requests persist.

  • Strategies have been suggested to mitigate this issue, such as reorganizing the presentation of what is available in premium vs. exclusive chats to catch attention before clients stop reading. This may help in reducing misunderstandings or intentional boundary-pushing.

  • There's a shared frustration over the entitlement some clients exhibit, expecting personalized or more intimate content without opting for the appropriate exclusive channels. This has forced some models to adopt a firmer stance, even at the risk of appearing unfriendly.

  • The challenge of communicating service boundaries is compounded on mobile devices, where details about premium and exclusive content are less visible unless specifically sought out by clients.

  • Experiences vary, with some models finding certain platforms worse for this behavior. The consensus is that while some clients do respect the boundaries once corrected, a significant portion continue to push, testing the patience and policies of performers.

Overall, the discussion illuminates the ongoing challenges webcam models face with boundary-pushing clients and the continuous effort to maintain clear and respected service parameters.

To read the forum, create an account. It's free!

- Between 3 and 15 characters
- Only alphanumeric characters are allowed
- Your email will not be visible to other members
- Use a valid email to activate your account