Members have been sharing their varied experiences with SextPanther, highlighting the platform's apparent shift towards requiring models to have a substantial following, specifically around 7,000 followers, for acceptance. This criterion seems to have affected many, with some models noting their applications were rejected due to not meeting the follower threshold, while others were accepted with fewer followers but reported minimal to no earnings through the platform. Discussion includes comparisons with other sites like NF, Chatfunn, and Arousr, with a general consensus on the importance of traffic generation for earning potential. There's also mention of the impacts of SESTA-FOSTA on the industry and how platforms might be narrowing their model demographics as a result.
- Models express frustration over SextPanther's high follower requirement for new sign-ups, contrasting with earlier policies.
- There's a reported inconsistency in acceptance criteria, with some models being accepted with fewer followers and others being rejected despite having a significant online presence.
- Discussion on the effectiveness of SextPanther and similar platforms in generating income for models, with many reporting minimal earnings.
- Concerns are raised about the evolving nature of webcam and adult content platforms, especially in light of legislation like SESTA-FOSTA, and how it's affecting model selection and platform policies.
- Experiences with customer service and application processes vary, with some models highlighting issues in communication and others finding success after persistence.
The conversation underscores a broader dialogue on industry trends, platform requirements, and the challenges of navigating the digital landscape as a webcam model.