Welcome to the discussion on Streamate fees, a topic that has generated considerable interest and debate among our community. Here's a snapshot of the key points and insights shared by our members:
- There's confusion over why some models on Streamate (SM) are charged a 65% fee while others are charged 70%. The criteria for determining these percentages aren't clear, leading to questions and speculation among models.
- Some members believe that completing all account requirements, such as verifying email and phone number, might influence the fee percentage. However, this theory hasn't been universally accepted as the sole factor.
- It has been noted that location seems to play a role in determining fee percentages, with US models reportedly taking home 35% and European models around 30%. Yet, there are inconsistencies, such as Canadian and UK models also receiving 35% in some cases, challenging the idea that location is the sole determinant.
- A discussion emerged around the notion that models from certain countries, considered high risk for chargebacks and fraud, might face higher fees. This is thought to cover the costs of dedicated fraud prevention teams, but doesn't fully explain the variation in fees among models from similar locations.
- There's speculation that recent fee increases might only apply to new performers, adding another layer of complexity to the fee structure on SM.
- Aside from fee discussions, technical issues related to streaming from different browsers have also been mentioned, indicating a broader range of concerns for models working with SM.
This summary encapsulates the ongoing dialogue and shared experiences of our community members regarding the fee structure on Streamate. The discussion highlights the need for clarity and transparency from the platform to address the concerns and confusion among its models.