This discussion focuses on the classification of studio camgirls in Romania as contractors versus employees, highlighting the control studios exert over the camgirls' actions during live sessions. Members discuss the legal implications of such control, referencing laws in various countries that differentiate between contractors and employees based on the level of control the employer has over the worker's actions. The conversation includes:

  • Observations on how some studios, such as Studio 20, direct camgirls' actions during live streams, suggesting a level of control that might classify them as employees rather than contractors.
  • A detailed explanation of the legal distinctions between contractors and employees in different countries, including France, where legal actions have led to reclassification of workers from contractors to employees.
  • A mention of California's assembly bill 5, which aims to reinforce the idea that contractors should not be controlled or directed during their job.
  • Insights from members outside of Romania, emphasizing cultural and economic differences that may influence the willingness of camgirls to challenge their employment status.
  • Encouragement for members to share personal experiences or knowledge on the subject, indicating an interest in understanding how widespread these practices are and their implications.

This summary captures the essence of the discussion without revealing any personal information or usernames. It serves to inform visitors about the complexity of employment classification for camgirls within the studio system in Romania and potentially other regions.

To read the forum, create an account. It's free!

- Between 3 and 15 characters
- Only alphanumeric characters are allowed
- Your email will not be visible to other members
- Use a valid email to activate your account