This topic discusses the necessity and process of adding content sites to the Wall of Shame tool, specifically highlighting the need due to experiences with abusive or non-compliant users. Key points include:
- A request to add content sites to the Wall of Shame, prompted by an encounter with an abusive person on ExtraLunchMoney (ELM).
- Concurrence from several members, pointing out that there are multiple candidates on ELM deserving of inclusion on the Wall.
- A specific mention of a user who wasted a model's time by expressing interest in financial domination (findom) without intending to pay.
- The successful update of the Wall of Shame to include content sites, as confirmed by a forum administrator.
- Expressions of gratitude towards the administrator for the swift action.
This discussion reflects the community's proactive stance on safety and accountability, ensuring that members are aware of and can avoid interactions with problematic users.