Exploring the investment into bluetooth/interactive toys such as Lovense and OhMiBod, members have shared a range of experiences and insights. These toys, while expensive, have been a topic of interest for their potential to enhance performance and earnings. Here's a summary of the collective feedback:

  • Initial experiences vary, with some models finding particular brands or models (like OhMiBod) less satisfactory, leading them to explore alternatives like Lovense, which have received more positive feedback for connectivity and enjoyment.
  • Investment in these toys, alongside upgrades to webcams and lighting, has been credited with significantly boosting daily income for some, although results can fluctuate.
  • Size and personal preference play a significant role in the usability and enjoyment of these toys, with some models finding them too large or not aligning with their personal preferences.
  • Durability can be an issue, with reports of the toys breaking after a year, highlighting the need for potential replacement investments.
  • Integration with platforms like Streamate poses challenges, with models seeking advice on how to effectively use the toys on platforms that do not support direct tip control integration.
  • Despite some challenges, many models report a substantial increase in income and viewer engagement when incorporating these toys into their performances.

This summary reflects the shared experiences and opinions of several models regarding the use of interactive toys in their performances. It highlights the balance between cost, enjoyment, and potential income enhancement that comes with investing in such technology.

To read the forum, create an account. It's free!

- Between 3 and 15 characters
- Only alphanumeric characters are allowed
- Your email will not be visible to other members
- Use a valid email to activate your account